Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up

A Lifelong Unbeliever Finds No Reason to Change His Mind

Are there any logical reasons to believe in God? Mathematician and bestselling author John Allen Paulos thinks not. In Irreligion he presents the case for his own worldview, organizing his book into twelve chapters that refute the twelve arguments most often put forward for believing in God’s existence. The latter arguments, Paulos relates in his characteristically lighthearted style, “range from what might be called golden oldies to those with a more contemporary beat. On the playlist are the firstcause argument, the argument from design, the ontological argument, arguments from faith and biblical codes, the argument from the anthropic principle, the moral universality argument, and others.” Interspersed among his twelve counterarguments are remarks on a variety of irreligious themes, ranging from the nature of miracles and creationist probability to cognitive illusions and prudential wagers. Special attention is paid to topics, arguments, and questions that spring from his incredulity “not only about religion but also about others’ credulity.” Despite the strong influence of his day job, Paulos says, there isn’t a single mathematical formula in the book.


Summary: A good survey of the classical arguments for God's existence, and how they fall short.
Rating: 5

This is a great little handbook that offers a cursary survey of the classical arguments for the existence of God, and provides the underlying reason why they don't hold up. He is clever, easily readable and though he is a mathematician, this book does not bog you down with mathematics. It is a good read and a useful book to keep around for quick reference.

Michael Tenenbaum - Author - Blessed Assurance? A Demonstration that Christian Fundamentalism is Simply False. Expanded - Limited Edition.