Tags
Language
Tags
September 2025
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
    Attention❗ To save your time, in order to download anything on this site, you must be registered 👉 HERE. If you do not have a registration yet, it is better to do it right away. ✌

    ( • )( • ) ( ͡⚆ ͜ʖ ͡⚆ ) (‿ˠ‿)
    SpicyMags.xyz

    Chappaqua (1966)

    Posted By: Someonelse
    Chappaqua (1966)

    Chappaqua (1966)
    DVD5 | VIDEO_TS | NTSC 4:3 | 01:21:54 | 4,23 Gb
    Audio: English AC3 2.0 @ 192 Kbps | Subs: None
    Genre: Art-house, Drama

    Director: Conrad Rooks
    Stars: Jean-Louis Barrault, Conrad Rooks, William S. Burroughs

    The bizarre hallucinations of a heroin addict in withdrawal provide the basis for this unstructured, autobiographical film by director Conrad Rooks. It begins as he arrives in Paris for a sleep-cure. As the strange visions begin, the story jumps haphazardly between reality and his dream-world memories.


    I think most of us have had those moments in our lives when, being a bit bored and confused, we go into a tailspin of alcohol, peyote and heroin abuse and spend a few years wandering the world in a haze of clinical psychosis.

    The difference is, most of us don't make a movie about it.

    Chappaqua (1966)

    But the Sixties were different. A time when anyone with a camera, a few influential friends, a lot of pluck and a trust fund could revolutionize the world of cinema. And that's not a bad way to look at Chappaqua, the recent re-release of Conrad Rooks' 1966 cult oddity.

    Rooks directed, starred in, and wrote the few slivers of dialogue in this film, which we are told is semi-autobiographical. And near as it gets to a story, it's the story of a spoiled young bon vivant and avid substance abuser who has committed himself to a Swiss sanitarium in hopes of escaping a world of dementia that may or may not be a nightmare, depending on how you feel about colorful visions of your own death.

    Chappaqua (1966)

    It's often hard to tell if this is a film about delusions, or simply delusional filmmaking. One minute our anti-hero is staggering through Paris. Next shot we're in Wyoming. Or India. Or Stonehenge. Or Manhattan. Or in yet another landscape of the fevered mind. Where'd that naked woman come from? Why is William S. Burroughs riding in a taxi with a dwarf? Who's that witch doctor in the bathtub? Who are ANY of these people? Well, you get the idea. Chappaqua is grotesquely non-linear, non-sensical and self-indulgent. In its few lucid moments it may even be intentionally amusing and provocative. But then that pretty much sums up the world and times Rooks was working with.

    Chappaqua (1966)

    It's painfully clear why they don't make films like this anymore. And it's both sad and funny that Rooks' long lost psycho-drama - so hellbent on shattering conventions - actually looks quaint in hindsight. With a soundtrack featuring Ravi Shankar, Phillip Glass, Ornette Coleman and The Fugs, Chappaqua is nothing if not a historical nugget. Perhaps it's best viewed that way. You may not need peyote with your popcorn. But it certainly couldnít hurt.
    Chappaqua (1966)

    At the risk of sounding like every other girl who has ever sat in a corner of Starbucks and spent a few hours writing emo poetry in her Hello Kitty notebook, I love the Beat Generation. I’ve read all of Jack Kerouac’s novels, Allen Ginsberg’s poems, and William S. Burroughs’ cut-ups. I’ve even tried to listen to the music of the Fugs and I just recently finished reading the very first Beat novel, John Clellon Holmes’ Go. It was my interest in the Beats that led to me discovering Chappaqua.

    Chappaqua (1966)

    Originally filmed in 1966 and released a year later, Chappaqua was produced, written, and directed by Conrad Rooks. The son of the president of Avon, Rooks had a lot of money and a lot of addictions. In 1962, Rooks checked into a European clinic where he detoxed and claimed to have been cured of his drug dependency through something called “sleep therapy.” Chappaqua is based on his experiences both as a drug addict and a patient and, since Rooks was something of a hanger-on in the American underground art scene, the final film featured cameos from such counterculture figures as Allen Ginsberg and William S. Burroughs.

    Chappaqua (1966)

    In the film, Rooks plays himself, a young man who is usually seen wandering aimlessly from one location to another. The film is edited in such a way that you’re never quite sure where Rooks is going to be from one scene to another. Most famously, the film’s opening features Rooks wandering across the countryside of Nebraska while images (and sounds) of New York’s 42nd Street are superimposed over his face. Later on in the film, Rooks will just as abruptly turn up walking through the streets of India and meditating with a random guru. Rooks, it quickly becomes apparent, is a man with no true home, a wanderer who seems to randomly alternate between being lost and being on a mission.

    Chappaqua (1966)

    For most of the film, however, Rooks is in a small clinic outside of France. Along with telling his doctor (played by Jean-Louis Barrault) about how he came to be addicted to drugs and alcohol, Rooks goes through withdrawal and has the surreal hallucinations that dominate the majority of the film. During one hallucination, Rooks sees himself as a gangster gunning down a midget in a parking garage. Then, suddenly, Rooks is no longer a gangster and instead, he’s a vampire speaking in an over-pronounced Transylvanian accent. A druid appears and does a jig in the middle of the Stonehenge and a witch doctor shows up and starts to dance through the halls of the clinic. Throughout it all, Rooks is haunted by the image of a stunningly beautiful woman (Paula Pritchett) in a white dress, kneeling by a placid lake. Observing all of this is the menacing figure of Opium Jones (played by William S. Burroughs), who continually encourages Rooks to stay on drugs and who may, or may not, be a figment of Rooks’ imagination.

    Chappaqua (1966)

    How to explain the odd (and occasionally frustrating) charm of Chappaqua. This is truly a pretentious mess of a movie, full of symbolism that is both obvious and willfully obscure. However, there’s a strange charm to the film’s pretension. The film may not make much sense but it’s never incoherent. Largely thanks to cinematographer Robert Frank, the visuals of the film are so strong and striking that they often provide the narrative drive that the film would otherwise lack. Chappaqua is, ultimately, just a fascinating film to watch.

    Chappaqua (1966)

    My main reason for enjoying and recommending Chappaqua, is that the film truly is a time capsule. Both the film’s strengths and its flaws can be linked back to the fact that it was made in 1966. It’s a true cultural artifact and, therefore, it is a must-see for anyone who is interested in either the Beats or the counter-culture that was indirectly descended from them
    Chappaqua (1966)

    Special Features:
    - Filmographies
    - Trailer

    Conrad Rooks's Siddhartha (1972) is here - link.
    All Credits goes to Original uploader.

    No More Mirrors, Please.


    D4EE6444D1B669E62839B1EE81477AAA *Chapakva.1P.rar

    D2461A1AD6AE6379B55C60CA626892D8 *Chapakva.part1.rar
    774FDC0DB4AB5B0C8A79F603ADAF45A6 *Chapakva.part2.rar
    2B5A48C061037AFB5BF473AF7A79655B *Chapakva.part3.rar
    EC806B7376831D5D03F39601AEA2858D *Chapakva.part4.rar
    3AE69EA74987BD18534996BE78D7B1E4 *Chapakva.part5.rar
    FD69169B9195037A777A587D8C2B3D8F *Chapakva.part6.rar
    D39DAAF5827DD07B080A90831CBCC640 *Chapakva.part7.rar
    D5BC9BD64EE656AD5964B9DC89D7673E *Chapakva.part8.rar
    Download: